Categories
Uncategorized

PFAS… “Forever” chemicals

Do you use water/stain-resistant products and clothing? You could be exposing yourself and others to persistent, harmful chemicals… And since some products that contain these chemicals don’t say so on the label, you could be completely unaware they are there.

Per- and Poly-Fluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) are a newer class of chemicals used to make products resist oil and water. They’re supposed to be safer than the older PFOS (Perfluoro Octane Sulfonates) like Teflon and Scotchgard. But are they?

These chemicals have been detected in over 98% of blood samples of tested Canadians and are showing up in the environment, sometimes in levels high enough to harm wildlife (and us!). And some of them disappear quickly from the blood but are stored in organ tissues (such as lungs). Researchers are learning how they disrupt our hormones and immune systems…

What are PFAS chemicals?

The PFAS class of chemicals are used to waterproof fabrics and clothing; to stain-proof fabrics, carpets and furniture; in coatings for non-stick pans; to keep food wrap paper from soaking up grease; for water-resistant cosmetics, and in fire-fighting foams.

The chemicals are only loosely attached to fabrics so are often detected in measurable amounts in house dust. They are persistent and mobile: they do not break down for decades and travel easily in the atmosphere. They concentrate in animals high in the food chain, resulting in higher levels in larger animals and humans as we eat contaminated food. Levels gradually increase over time from these low-level exposures, because the chemicals are not eliminated from our bodies or broken down over time.

What do PFAS do to us?

There are over 5,000 different PFAS chemicals that have been synthesized. The harmful effects vary, but some are known to either block or mimic our hormones, and inhibit the effectiveness of our immune systems. Sadly, these chemicals have been presumed to be safe, partly because they are so stable. Like cigarettes, the burden of proving they are harmful falls to governments and environmental groups, rather than requiring the companies who manufacture them to prove they are safe long-term.

One early sign there was a problem was when an increase in cases of breast cancer in women and testicular cancer in men were noted in firefighters regularly exposed to high levels of PFAS in firefighting foams. As well as exposure while putting out fires and during training, their protective equipment often contains similar chemicals, so they were being exposed to these chemicals more than most. “Canaries in the mine…”

Other diseases and conditions have also been found to be associated with exposure to these chemicals, too. Some of these include:

· increased risk of prostate, liver and kidney cancer,

· ulcerative colitis (inflammatory bowel disease),

· increased blood cholesterol,

· increased blood pressure during pregnancy,

· thyroid and other hormone changes,

· early menopause,

· decreased birth weight in babies,

· decreased fertility,

· changes in bone density, and

· Type 2 diabetes.

A 3M sponsored study in the 1970s showed this type of chemical could decrease immune response in monkeys, and another at Harvard University in 2015 showed the same in humans. A 2015 study in children demonstrated that higher levels of PFAS in the blood were associated with a decreased immune response to vaccines.

Ongoing studies report that patients with higher levels of PFAS, especially one known as PFBA that deposits in lung tissue, tend to have worse outcomes from COVID-19 infection. The fact that men and older individuals tend to have higher levels of these chemicals may explain the increased risk these groups have of more severe COVID infection. Note that PFBA was thought to be safer because less was detected in the blood, while instead it was being pulled directly into the lungs where it appears to be having a local effect in lowering the immune response there.

CEPA, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, was written in 1999 and is now outdated. It needs to take into consideration newer studies, vulnerable populations (like those working in the industry), those who live near hot spots (like previous spills or plants that create or use these chemicals), possible contamination of food by packaging, and babies born to mothers who are affected. PFAS and the similar, older PFOS are excreted in breast milk and can result in babies having 10 times the level of the mother, at a crucial time in the development of the immune system.

Older chemical safety tests generally consisted of a 1-time high dose test in an animal, but what about chronic low dose exposure? Because these chemicals do not break down and are stored in body fat, they accumulate in us over the years. Chronic low dose exposure is now considered more harmful than a single large dose exposure, in which the body appears to have a better chance of eliminating the chemical. These kinds of exposures need to be tested, too, before deciding a chemical is safe.

Although none of these chemicals are currently manufactured in Canada, according to a report I read, they are found in products we import. A recent CBC Marketplace investigation found 1 in 5 imported children’s clothing items they examined contained elevated levels of harmful chemicals, including PFAS, lead and phthalates (chemicals used in plastic that can contaminate the product packaged in it). On a positive note, all the companies were contacted and immediately removed the affected products from sale. They also committed to examining their supply chains for other harmful products.

Meanwhile, like PCBs and dioxins, these chemicals appear to be concentrating in the North. They travel easily through the atmosphere, enter the food chain there and concentrate in larger animals, like seals and polar bears… and humans.

Chemicals are too often considered safe until proven dangerous. Even with evidence, laws are slow to change. We saw this in the many years it took for tobacco to be considered a harmful substance (and it is still being sold today for daily use!). Because of their persistence and stability, we will continue to be exposed to forever chemicals like PFAS for many years after they are finally banned from use.

Current regulations need to be updated, and safety testing must improve to protect us from potential harm from newly synthesized chemicals. It’s just not acceptable to allow persistent substances to be sold with insufficient testing, only to discover the harm they cause after years of exposure to the public. Full labelling of chemicals added to products needs to be required.

So, how can you avoid these chemicals?

Be suspicious of any product that is water, grease, or stain resistant. These include food packaging, rain gear, waterproof cosmetics, stain resistant carpets and furniture, and non-stick pans. I’m choosing to cook in stainless steel and cast-iron pots these days!

References:

A new class of ‘forever chemicals’ is an emerging threat to our health and environment—CBC Radio series: Quirks and Quarks episodes on Oct 9, Oct 23 and Nov 6, 2020 (find it on the CBC Listen app)

Experts warn of high levels of chemicals in clothes by some fast-fashion retailers—CBC News Marketplace

PFAS exposure linked with worse COVID-19 outcomes—Harvard T.H.Chan School of Public Health

Severity of COVID-19 at elevated exposure to perfluorinated alkylates—PLOS ONE

Photo by Alex Kondratiev on Unsplash

#ForeverChemicals #PFAS

Categories
Uncategorized

Long Neuro-COVID…

Understanding how COVID could affect your brain

Now that we have vaccines and better treatments for COVID, researchers are finding time to investigate the possible long-term effects of this infection. Although most people recover completely within 2 to 4 weeks, as many as 1 person in 3 continue to have effects from the virus more than 3 months after diagnosis. For some, these problems continue for many months, and doctors are struggling to find effective treatments to get them back to normal. Long-COVID-19 [also called “post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection” (PASC) or just post-COVID-19 syndrome], is defined as the effects of COVID-19 that persist more than 3 months (or 4 weeks, depending on whose definition you use!) after being diagnosed with the SARS-C0V-2 coronavirus. And the stats of how many have these complaints are all over the map, because of poor definition and diagnosis of this condition patients call “long COVID”.

A recent study of surviving patients (with no previous neurological symptoms) hospitalized for COVID-19, examined symptoms they continued to experience 6 months after leaving hospital:

  • Fatigue 34%
  • Memory/attention problems 31%
  • Sleep disorders 31%
  • Hyposmia (loss of sense of smell) 18%
  • Cognitive defects 17.5%
  • Postural tremor 13.8%
  • Subtle motor/sensory deficits 7.6%

Overall, 40% of people in the study had neurological abnormalities. Increased age, other health conditions, and severity of COVID-19 were all risk factors for this long neuro-COVID. Although this study examined people who were hospitalized with the virus, other studies are finding similar numbers in those with mild symptoms who did not require hospitalization.

With approximately 240 million cases and almost 5 million deaths confirmed worldwide as I write this, there will be a large population of recovered COVID-19 patients that could end up with long-term consequences of this contagious disease. Multi-organ effects of the virus are well-documented, but the potential long-term effects are just now being collected and assessed.

There are 3 main types of long-term effects of COVID: respiratory (shortness of breath, chest pain), cardiac (heart inflammation or damage), and neurological symptoms (brain fog, fatigue, headache, numbness/tingling, disorders of taste/smell, sleep disorders, decreased exercise tolerance, dizziness, problems with body temperature regulation, and muscle/joint pain). I’ll be focusing on the neurological symptoms—those related to nerve function.

Some lingering neurological symptoms can be common in anyone needing a stay in ICU—1/3 of ICU patients with respiratory failure or shock from any cause can have cognitive (thinking) impairment that compares to moderate traumatic brain injury. This is referred to as “post intensive care syndrome” and it’s more common in the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. However, some people are also reporting similar impairment in their thinking after recovering from mild or moderate COVID that did not require hospitalization.

Although the coronavirus is named SARS-CoV2 (SARS stands for Sudden Acute Respiratory Syndrome), scientists now know that it has effects on many body systems. In addition to respiratory symptoms (cough, fever, shortness of breath), it also increases the ability of the blood to form clots, and clots can cause damage in the heart (heart failure, myocarditis), and brain (strokes, seizures) as well as the lungs (scar tissue) that can cause health problems and increase risk of other diseases in the future. In addition, COVID-19 can weaken blood vessels and cause them to leak, potentially contributing to long-term problems with the liver, kidneys, and brain. Increased rates of new onset diabetes, heart disease and kidney are also reported.

Other effects are believed to be caused by how our bodies’ immune systems respond to the virus infection, creating multisystem inflammatory syndrome, with some organs and tissues becoming severely inflamed. Immune cells go everywhere in the body, so inflammation and an immune response elsewhere in the body can result in overactivity of immune cells in the brain—sometimes creating an “autoimmune” reaction where the body attacks itself.

Researchers are also suggesting the possibility of ongoing viral infection as a potential source of long COVID symptoms, possibly in the gut or elsewhere outside the respiratory system. The infection is known to affect the olfactory glands (the “smell” organ in the nose), with loss of smell and taste relatively common in acute COVID-19. This is thought to be a possible route for the virus to infect the brain, a possible cause of the brain damage they see in neuro-COVID. However, no virus has yet been detected in the brain itself. The research continues…

Experts warn the combined effects of COVID—direct viral effects, system inflammation, strokes, and organ damage (lungs, liver, pancreas, and kidneys)—might even increase risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease in the future. Inheriting the ApoE4 gene increases risk of both developing Alzheimer’s and severe COVID, a connection that researchers note and something that COVID survivors might want to keep in mind. Investigating possible parallels between Alzheimer’s and Neuro-COVID could potentially find better ways of preventing and treating both diseases.

Some long-term effects of COVID-19 are similar to those of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)—extreme fatigue that is worse after physical or mental activity, but doesn’t improve with rest. Like Post COVID-19, it often begins after a viral infection. There is some hope that research into long-COVID-19 causes and mechanisms, may also help those who suffer from CFS.

But COVID can have subtle long-term effects too—one small study found persistent impairment in sustained attention in a group of younger people thought to be fully recovered from COVID. Whether this is due to underlying inflammation, silent strokes (a stroke with no obvious immediate symptoms) or lack of oxygen while sick is not known. Silent strokes typically affect the brain’s white matter that contains the nerves that connect different parts of the brain. This wiring is needed for attention and, when it’s damaged, it is more difficult to sustain and focus your attention for a length of time.

So, there is still a lot to learn about this new(ish) virus and what it can do to us. Organizing and sharing information between researchers around the world will help find the answers we need sooner.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently published a standardized definition of Post COVID-19 syndrome, something needed to help researchers gather data in a consistent manner world-wide. The following are the criteria they describe, after consultation with international experts and patients:

  • A history of probable or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection
  • Symptoms for at least 3 months from the onset of COVID-19
  • At least 2 months of the symptoms that cannot be explained by an alternate diagnosis
  • Common symptoms: fatigue, shortness of breath, cognitive (thinking) dysfunction, and others (such as anxiety; depression; pain; and hearing, smell and taste changes or loss)
  • Symptoms generally affect everyday functioning
  • Symptoms may be new-onset following an initial recovery or continuing from the original infection and may fluctuate or relapse over time

There have been some criticisms of this definition: it bases the diagnosis on excluding other causes rather than by simply including a set of symptoms, and some think the definition could have included new-onset diabetes, heart disease and kidney disease as symptoms of ongoing COVID related disease.

By comparison, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the US defines “Post COVID conditions” as symptoms of COVID-19 that persist beyond the acute phase of 4 or more weeks.

We may also need a separate definition to describe post COVID-19 in children, as their symptoms can be different from those in adults. So far, there is limited data in young patients, but case reports are beginning to be collected and shared. A UK study published in January 2021 found 13 to 17% (depending on age) still had symptoms at 5 weeks from onset of the virus infection. Another study in Italy in November 2020 found 52.7% of the 120 children studied had at least 1 symptom at 4 months after diagnosis. Again, statistics all over the map, probably due to a lack of definition and diagnosis of the disease.

Symptoms in children included sore throat, joint pain, fatigue, headache, chest pain, gastrointestinal (digestive) problems, nausea, mood swings, dizziness, and rashes.

In children, the virus can trigger Multisystem Inflammation Syndrome (MIS-C), also known as Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS). Case reports describe some children with extensive neurological symptoms and fatigue, similar to that in adults.

One benefit of developing and sharing a strong definition of a disease is to help doctors learn about it and diagnose it more accurately. Because of a lack of knowledge and awareness of Post COVID-19, many patients have been misdiagnosed over the past year and a half, some being told it was just stress, anxiety or “all in their head”.

As one woman said: “I just want doctors to have the courage to say they don’t know what’s wrong, and to offer to read, consult or test further to find out what it could be.” Having had a series of (non-COVID) misdiagnoses in the past few months myself, I must say the doctor who most impressed me was the one who said he didn’t know what I had, shared several possibilities, and asked if I wanted to have another test that might give more information. For whatever reason, it’s hard for some doctors to be “human” and admit they’re sometimes making an educated guess, and studies have shown it often takes women longer to be diagnosed (and women are less likely to be believed when describing symptoms) than men. As a patient, I really appreciated the doctor sharing the thought process of his diagnosis and discussing my options.

Meanwhile, in early September, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) hosted a webinar with a group of experts to discuss how to diagnose and treat Post COVID-19 most effectively. That’s a giant first step toward sharing current information.

There are so many reasons to do everything we can to avoid catching and passing on this contagious virus. It’s important to understand the risk of long-term effects, that they can develop even after mild cases and may not be evident until well into the future, and the possibility that the virus has to potential to affect our brain function. These give us more reasons to do everything we can to avoid this infection!

Lastly, on a positive note, there are some basic strategies that are known to decrease the risk of neurological disorders, like Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and might be expected to decrease the chance of long neuro-Covid getting worse rather than better. These include getting regular exercise (sometimes within set limits), eating a healthy diet, and staying socially engaged with other people. These strategies can reduce risk of developing Alzheimer’s by 40%!

So, next time you’re talking to someone who’s hesitant about whether to take the plunge and get that vaccine, you can tell them about how doing so might help protect their brain!

P.S. Had my long-awaited surgery 24 hours ago, and starting to feel better already! In spite of its shortcomings, and even with all the COVID tests and protocols it must deal with, modern medicine is still wonderful. The doctors, nurses and all the support staff are still working hard to keep us healthy and safe. I thought it was cool that I was introduced to the entire team before I was put under!

This blog was longer than usual, but there’s so much information and research coming out now about previously unknown consequences of COVID-19. There seem to be new articles on this topic every week. If you’re interested in reading more, here are the references I delved into when writing this week’s blog…

References:

COVID-19: from an acute to chronic disease? Potential long-term health consequences—NIH National Library of Medicine PubMed.gov

WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard—World Health Organization

COVID-19 (coronavirus): Long-term effects—Mayo Clinic

Long-term neurological manifestations of COVID-19:prevalence and predictive factors—EAN Pages

‘Ill, abandoned, unable to access help:’ Living with long COVID—Medical News Today

Women and pain: Disparities in experience and treatment–Harvard Health Publishing

#longcovid #longhaulers #neurocovid

Categories
Uncategorized

Breast cancer… sometimes misunderstood!

Since October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month, I thought I’d dedicate a blog to this terrible disease that affects 1 in 8 women in North America, not to mention the impact it has on their families and those they love.

So here are some myths about breast cancer, and what the experts say about them…

Myth #1

A breast injury can cause breast cancer. Although a breast injury can sometimes cause changes in the breast tissue that might mimic the look of a cancer in a mammogram, it cannot cause cancer. But just to be sure, your doctor may want to do a needle biopsy, removing a small amount of breast tissue with a needle and syringe to examine in a lab, if an area looks different than usual due to a previous injury.

Myth #2

Underwire bras increase the risk of breast cancer. The wires do not cause cancer, but they can irritate the skin under the breasts, causing it to break down. Irritated skin is less resistant to bacteria and fungi which could cause an infection or abscess in the breast. Also non-wired bras are more comfy!!

Myth #3

IVF increases the risk of breast cancer. In vitro fertilization (IVF) involves the use of estrogen-like drugs to stimulate the ovaries to produce eggs. This led some experts to wonder whether the treatment could increase the risk of hormone-sensitive cancer cells developing, or at least speed the growth of any of this type of cancerous cells that might be forming. Although no studies have specifically been done to confirm this doesn’t happen, one trial compared the cancer risk of women who had had IVF with those who had not, and found no difference.

Myth #4

I won’t develop breast cancer because no-one in my family has had it. Most women who are diagnosed with breast cancer have no family history—only 5-10% of breast cancers are caused by a genetic mutation that was inherited. In fact, many diagnosed women have no known risk factors at all. Obviously, we’re missing something… (perhaps an environmental connection?) More research into the causes, please!!

Myth #5

Stress can cause breast cancer. While too much stress can certainly affect our health, there is evidence to show there is no association between stress and breast cancer. On the other hand, breast cancer most certainly causes stress! We can all benefit from learning effective ways of dealing with the stresses of modern life…

Myth #6

A healthy lifestyle eliminates breast cancer risk. A healthy lifestyle can reduce the risk of breast cancer, but it can’t eliminate it. Refer back to Myth #4… we need more research into the causes of breast cancer!

Myth #7

Breast cancer only occurs in older women. It is true that most cancers occur in older women. Age is a known risk factor—one we can’t do anything about. Screening mammograms are recommended only after age 50 in most countries, and after 40 in the US, as they are less accurate in younger women with more dense breast tissue. But about 5% of cancers are diagnosed in women under 40 years, typically in those with a strong family history of the cancer. It is recommended to watch for any unusual breast changes, like lumps, puckering of the skin or a nipple pulling inward (inverted nipple) and to see your doctor right away if any of these occur.

Myth #8

All breast lumps are cancerous. Actually, most new breast lumps are not cancer. A cyst (a pocket of liquid surrounded by a membrane) feels like a lump, and these are fairly common. However, always see your doctor right away for an evaluation if you notice a new lump or any other unusual breast change.

Myth #9

An abortion increases the risk of breast cancer. An abortion interrupts the normal hormone cycle of pregnancy (and pregnancy before age 30 is believed to reduce breast cancer risk), causing some to wonder whether it could increase the risk of a hormone dependent breast cancer. However, a large observational study in Denmark and several other smaller studies found no link between abortion and breast cancer.

Myth #10

Nipple piercings increase breast cancer risk. Piercings do not increase cancer risk, but they can lead to increased risk of infection, abscess, nerve damage, scars, cysts and difficulty breastfeeding (due to blocked ducts from scar tissue).

Myth #11

Sugar causes breast cancer. Refined sugar in excessive amounts is bad for our general health, but there is no evidence it directly causes breast cancer. I have read reports of research looking at very low sugar/high fat diets (an extreme form of the keto diet) to slow the growth of cancer cells in general, but the studies are not yet conclusive. Studies specifically looking at sugar and breast cancer have had “mixed and inconclusive” results, according to experts.

Myth #12

Men do not get breast cancer. Yes, they do! One in every 100 cases of breast cancer occurs in men. Men also should stay alert to any changes in the breast area, particularly as it can spread more quickly in males since they do not have as much breast tissue to contain it. As well, men are not screened for this cancer and tend to have less support when they are diagnosed with it.

Myth #13

Mammograms and biopsies can cause breast cancer to spread. The thinking here is that the squeezing and poking of a potential cancer could cause the cells to seed in another part of the breast. Some women also worry that the radiation of the mammogram could cause a cancer to begin. However, very low doses of radiation are used in current mammograms, and these are considered safe (although the operator, being there daily, needs to protective themselves from work-related exposure). No evidence has been found that these tests cause cancers to spread and they give valuable diagnostic and early-detection information that save many lives.

Myth #14

No lump means no cancer. Cancers that have formed “palpable” lumps (ones that can be felt with the fingers) have often been there, growing, for several years. The advantage of screening mammograms is that they can often detect a cancer before it is large enough to be palpable, greatly increasing the chance of a complete cure.

Myth #15

Anti-perspirants cause breast cancer. This myth started because many breast cancers occur in the upper outer area of the breast, the area closer to the armpit. However, very little if any of the ingredients in anti-perspirants are absorbed and there is no evidence that they would cause cancer if they were absorbed. At least one large well-conducted that compared breast cancer survivors with healthy women found no evidence of a problem with anti-perspirants or deodorants. The tiny grains of minerals left on the skin by antiperspirants do, however, show up on a mammogram, causing confusion for the radiologist interpreting the image. This is why they always insist that these products not be used on the day you are having a scan.

Myth #16

Carrying a phone in your bra can cause cancer. While most experts will say there is no evidence that cell phones cause any type of cancer, a few have reported case studies of unusual cancers that began in the same location where the woman carried her phone for several hours every day. Not proof of a cause, but one doctor was suspicious enough to publish a report after seeing several similar cases (which I linked to in my Sept 17th blog on environmental links to cancer). It might be a good idea to carry your phone in a purse or proper phone case, both to protect it and possibly also you! Cell phone manufacturers do recommend avoiding exposure of the phone to sweat, as the liquid could cause damage to the phone (as happened to my daughter, who no longer tucks hers into the waistband of her workout pants!)

So, there you go… less to worry about, right? I think the key in avoiding many diseases, including cancer, is to strive for as healthy a lifestyle as possible: eat well, exercise, limit alcohol to recommended amounts, and avoid exposure to nasty chemicals. And, since it’s Breast Cancer Awareness month, maybe make a little donation that might help researchers find the causes and cures for this disease that affects too many women…

References:

Medical Myths: 15 breast cancer misconceptions—Medical News Today

Antiperspirant Safety: Should You Sweat It?—WebMD

Categories
Uncategorized

Self-hypnosis… not what you think

For most of us, “hypnosis” brings to mind a stage show where people are made to do silly things by a hypnotist. But any hypnotist will tell you the participants do these things willingly, eager to be part of the show, and that they can’t really hypnotize anyone into doing something they don’t want to do. They’ve all had skeptics who just sat on the chair, wanting to prove hypnosis doesn’t “work”.

But the Practical Pain Management website tells us that “Hypnosis is a cognitive (mental) process such as imagination in which a patient is guided to respond to suggestions for changes in perceptions, sensations, thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. It involves learning how to use your mind and thoughts to manage emotional distress (such as anxiety), unpleasant physical symptoms (such as pain), and certain habits or behaviors (such as quitting smoking). People can be trained to self-hypnotize, guiding themselves through a hypnotic procedure.”

You could think of hypnosis as a combination of the placebo effect, meditation and positive affirmation. When we focus on something positive we want, eliminating other thoughts, we can encourage our subconscious mind to help us work toward our goal.

Placebo effect

With the placebo effect, believing that a medication or treatment will work activates the immune system and when they work together you can expect a better result. All valid drug trials are required to compare the medication to a placebo, and it is the difference that shows the effect of the drug. The placebo effect can be as high as 90% for some treatments, for example tension headaches. This is an example of how influencing the mind can have physical effects.

Pharmacist, Émile Coué (1857-1926), noted that more of his patients got better when he praised the effects of the medications he dispensed, than when he did not. Today, pharmacists are taught to always share the benefits of a drug before talking about the side effects to promote a positive attitude toward the treatment.

Meditation

Relaxing the body and clearing your mind, focusing on pleasant thoughts and images, and “mindfulness” techniques of focusing on the present (rather than dwelling on the past or worrying about the future) are techniques used in inducing a state of hypnosis that are similar to meditation.

Positive affirmation

Seeking help from a professional hypnotist to change a habit—for example quitting smoking—can help you bolster your determination to succeed. One technique used is to repeat a statement of the result you want, for example “I am a non-smoker” to change your beliefs deep in your sub-conscious. Of course, if you really don’t want to quit, the hypnosis just won’t work. You need to want the change and be ready to do what it takes. Hypnosis just helps increase your determination and belief that you will succeed.

So, what about self-hypnosis? Do you need to worry that you won’t “wake up”? When can it be useful? Is it difficult to do? I was curious, so I decided to read about it. Here is some of what I learned…

Hypnosis has been used as a medical treatment for centuries. The name comes from the sleep temples, or “hypnos” used by the Greeks to treat ailments. Imagery (picturing yourself on a beach), chants, drumming and dancing rituals while focussing on a goal could all be considered forms of hypnosis. However, it is less well-known than other alternative therapies, as most medical schools do not include it in their curricula.

It can be used to provide analgesia, reduce stress, relieve anxiety, improve sleep, improve mood, and reduce the need for strong pain medication such as opioids. It is not recommended for anyone with a severe, untreated psychological disorder, those under the influence of recreational drugs or alcohol or a person who has delusions or hallucinations at the time of treatment.

Hypnosis by a professional achieves its goals more quickly than trying to do it by yourself. If you are wanting to help address a more serious issue or habit, it’s the way to go. But for simpler goals, it might be worthwhile giving self-hypnosis a try. There are several techniques that can be successful, depending on the person. Professional hypnotists will sometimes teach patients self-hypnosis or provide recordings to continue the benefit of treatments between appointments.

We know that anxiety can increase pain perception and that distraction can reduce it. I used iPad games for years to reduce the pain of injections I was giving to children. Even a simple “Take a deep breath” was often enough of a distraction to help adults feel less needle pain. Closing your eyes and picturing yourself on a beach (or wherever your favourite vacation place might be) can help you reduce anxiety, decrease pain or fall asleep more quickly. Our dentist even has a TV mounted on the office ceiling for distraction!

So, I can understand how hypnosis can be beneficial. You’re basically learning to distract yourself and replace negative thoughts with positive ones more effectively. So, I gave it a try… but I found it was harder to achieve pain reduction than I thought it might be. Apparently, it takes practice!

But, several methods are suggested, and some work better than others, depending on the person. Here are some basic strategies used by professional hypnotists:

1. Autosuggestion—This is repeating suggestions to yourself, while closing the eyes to decrease other sensations and distractions

2. Autogenic training—This involves learning to create physical change from within, with the use of meditation, visualization and the mind’s ability to control the autonomic (“automatic”) nervous system that controls the body functions we don’t think about, like blood pressure, heart beat, reaction to stress, etc.

3. Progressive muscle relaxation—Consciously tensing then relaxing muscles (for example, from head to foot) helps reverse unconscious muscle tension, inducing relaxation.

4. Mindfulness—Focusing thoughts on the present with no worry about the past or anticipation of what the future holds. Focusing on the breath can be used to relax, clear and focus the mind in preparation to receive desired suggestions.

Steps used in hypnosis:

a. Induction of a trance or focus—guiding or being guided to focus your attention. Note that a trance state occurs any time you are selectively focused so deeply on something that you block out other sensations and stimuli.

b. Deepen focus—increasingly relax and focus your mind on the task you want to accomplish. Assistance from a professional would be helpful in this stage.

c. Auto-suggest (make a positive suggestion to yourself)—Make suggestions for the outcome you want to align your actions with your desires. For example, say “I am a non-smoker” rather than “I want to quit smoking”. This can be done by using a recording of your voice or by speaking to yourself repeatedly. Identify and write or record your mantra before you begin.

d. Termination—in self-hypnosis, you are always awake and can end the session whenever you choose.

A session with a professional hypnotist may have several more steps than this. Most are trained psychologists who explore your underlying issues before beginning and combine hypnosis with other psychological techniques. Therapists will often teach clients self-hypnosis so they can continue the benefit between treatments.

When training patients to perform self-hypnosis, some hypnotists will suggest placing a reminder in a prominent place, for example, writing your mantra with dry-erase marker on the bathroom mirror or on a sticky note on the edge of your computer screen. I like the mirror idea as it would remind you every morning and evening, ideal times to set your mood and intentions for the day, and to relax you for a good night’s sleep…

One hypnotist-author whose work I read suggests following the P.O.W.E.R. acronym to organize a self-hypnosis treatment:

P—Present. Don’t worry about the past or the future. Allow your mind to only consider the present.

O—Open your mind to using your internal creativity and intuition to solve your problem.

W—Written affirmation. State the change you want to accomplish and 1 to 3 actions that will make this happen.

E—Explore. Spend a few minutes exploring the benefits of embracing and achieving your affirmation.

R—Ratify. Commit to the outcome in your affirmation. Lock your mind around it. Put the idea of success exclusively in your mind.

Biofeedback

There is another similar technique, called biofeedback, that uses instruments (for example a blood pressure cuff) to motivate and confirm the patient’s success in influencing actions that are under the control of the autonomic (subconscious) nervous system. Studies have found people can be taught to lower blood pressure, slow heart rate, reduce anxiety, increase blood flow to certain areas of the body, and modify other similar parameters using various instruments as an external source of motivation rather than an internal one as with hypnosis. Since the instruments also confirm success, biofeedback is considered more scientific by some people than hypnosis, but the processes are actually quite similar.

The bottom line…

Self-hypnosis can only do what is physically possible. For most people, it should be regarded as an “add on” to other standard treatments, not as a substitute. And it takes practice. As I read various articles plus a book about hypnosis over the past couple of weeks, I tried some of the techniques. The best I was able to achieve was a slight and very temporary reduction in pain, so I won’t be throwing away my Tylenol any time soon! But I could see that hypnosis could be helpful in some situations, and the benefit of consulting a professional if you are serious about learning self-hypnosis. I also learned you would need plenty of practice to achieve lasting benefit.

PS: The “mandala” drawing above is a relaxing, meditative form of art that I learned this summer… a Zen combination of drawing, colouring and meditation!

References:

Hypnosis: Tool for Pain Management—Practical Pain Management

The Seven Most Effective Methods of Self-hypnosis: How to Create Rapid Change in your Health, Wealth, and Habits—Richard K. Nongard, Certified Professional Hypnotist

Biofeedback—Mayo Clinic

Chronic back pain: Can psychological therapy be an effective treatment? Medical News Today

Categories
Uncategorized

Avoiding “cracks” in the system…

After my “Falling through the cracks” blog a couple of weeks ago, I received a lot of comments and notes from people who have experienced healthcare hiccups like I have. One reader shared two excellent suggestions to add to my list, based on her experiences, that hadn’t occurred to me when writing. I thought they were worth sharing…

1. Don’t self-diagnose. Give all your information to your doctor (don’t hold anything back that might be relevant!) and get a diagnosis from a professional.

Many of us turn to “Dr. Google” when we have symptoms (I’m guilty of it too!) but, of course, there’s a lot of misinformation out there. And even if you’re reading a reputable website, it often takes background knowledge and expertise to interpret your symptoms– that’s why your doctor’s training and experience are so important. They know the questions to ask to rule out that disease you’re worried about, or to suspect a condition unfamiliar to you. Sometimes a test or physical examination is needed to find what is wrong.

I have seen the recommendation, though, that if you suspect you have a particular medical condition, you should mention it to your doctor, whether it’s something you’ve had previously, you know someone with the condition, or it’s just something you’ve just read about. Your doctor will explain why they know your problem isn’t what you suspect (putting your mind at ease!) or, especially if it’s a condition you’ve had before, they might consider it in their search for a potential diagnosis.

I recall an elderly gentleman years ago, asking at the pharmacy counter where he might find the non-prescription muscle relaxant tablets. As I escorted him to the shelf where the product was displayed, he grumbled that he wasn’t confident in the young doctor who had recommended this treatment… he’d had back pain for years and “knew” it was arthritis. Apparently, he didn’t think it was important to inform the doctor of this. And the young physician, obviously, didn’t ask about the duration of the pain. Diagnosing is like solving a puzzle, and every piece of information is important!

2. If you are not getting results with your doctor and your symptoms are getting worse, head to the emergency room (or local after-hours) for a second opinion. Be sure to tell them all details of treatments you’ve tried thus far.

You know the saying: two heads are better than one. And, in medicine, knowing what treatments didn’t work also helps to find the correct diagnosis. So, even returning to your own doctor when a treatment doesn’t work, will help her figure out what’s causing your problem.

But doctors do put their heads together to discuss patients who aren’t improving as expected with treatment. In hospital, they call these meetings “grand rounds” and the meetings include many different health professionals, all sharing their expertise and suggestions for treatment. In an ideal world, this would happen in community medical clinics too. A goal to strive for!

But it can sometimes take time to get an appointment with your family doctor – they have many patients to keep up with and personal lives too. And some offices are better at triaging who needs to be seen sooner than others and keep slots open for those who shouldn’t wait to be seen.

If you are in immediate distress, for example with severe pain or difficulty breathing, the emergency department is the place to go. Or call an ambulance if it might be life-threatening, especially if you live a distance from the hospital. Often the ability to conduct blood tests or scans can take a lot of the educated guesswork out of diagnosing the problem on the first try. However, booking a follow-up appointment with your doctor later will ensure they know about new developments, and they will be able to monitor the results of any prescribed treatment.

Knowledge is good

Of course, knowledge about any medical condition you have is a good thing. If you do decide to learn more about a disease you have, ask your doctor to recommend a source of information. There are often non-drug approaches you can incorporate into your lifestyle that can improve your condition or reduce the risk of it developing again. Websites hosted by established medical clinics, universities, government, and medical schools are generally based on science, and monitored and updated regularly. National health organizations (for example, a national diabetes association, if you are diagnosed with diabetes) often provide good quality patient information that is easy to read and understand. If you are unsure of the validity of any information, ask your doctor to confirm that it is correct and applies to you.

Most high-quality websites will show the references used to supply information for the article. You have probably noticed that I do this most of the time (apart from opinion articles and those based on personal experiences, when I will be clear that is what the article is). In fact, when I read an interesting health-related article, I also look up the original references they used to gather information for the article to learn more, as well as to verify their interpretation of the information. I’d encourage you to do the same!

Of course, today’s blog is in the “personal experiences” category so no references. But I will mention a few of my favourite sites… they include Mayo Clinic, Health Canada, British and American government sites, and I love Google Scholar—the search engine that searches published scientific literature. Sadly, more and more articles are now behind paywalls, unlike when I first started using it in the early 2000s. In an ideal world, knowledge would be shared for the benefit of all, enabling better evidence-based decisions and furthering research and treatments.

PS…

So, more good news on a personal level… I won’t have to wait months for treatment as the receptionist warned me I might. Pain has been called the 4th vital sign—it’s important to let your healthcare provider know the level of pain you are experiencing and how long you’ve had it. I think that’s probably what made the difference for me… I have an appointment on October 21st! Just 3 weeks away.

Hopefully I will be able to put all this behind me, but I’ll continue to look for ways to improve our health system and to help others navigate it efficiently. Nice to know it all works when you really need it, though! Communication is key.